Haojue tr300 fuel consumption (Haojue tr300 fuel consumption)
Further discussion on how to choose Honda CM300 and haojue TR300 There are parameters this time.
This is a mending work. Yesterday, at the request of riders, I wrote an article about the choice of Honda CM300 and Haojue TR300. The friends who can keep up with the rhythm basically agree with the core content of the article.
The motorcycle friends who just started to understand these two cars said that the article was too empty and had no practical value, because "there is not even a basic parameter comparison, so what should we choose?" For this reason, let's honestly compare the parameters again, and by the way, emphasize my views on these two cars.
Honda CM300 is currently priced at 34500.
Haojue TR300 is scheduled at 26680-28980.
The price difference between the two models is already very obvious. Although the final selling price of the Haughty TR300 is still unknown, its price range is getting smaller and smaller. If we compare it according to the lowest price, the price difference between the two models is nearly 8,000 yuan, and even if we compare it with the highest price, it will be 5,500 yuan. For riders who pay attention to price performance, we can make a choice here.
In terms of appearance, neither Honda's CM300 nor Haojue's TR300 is absolutely beautiful. It is easy for riders to laugh at these two cars with the face values of the same displacement models, such as the Jinjila 300 and the QJ Flash 300. Therefore, their appearance, I feel, does not play much role in the process of comparison, and it is just a question of liking or not. In addition, the positioning styles of the two models are different, so there is no need to pull hard.
In terms of power, the gap between the two models is very obvious. From the engine structure, TR300 will be more in line with mainstream standards. After all, it is equipped with a two-cylinder water-cooled EFI engine, while CM300 is equipped with a single-cylinder engine. As for performance, first look at the parameters.
The actual displacement of TR300 engine is 298ml, the compression ratio is 11.5:1, the maximum power is 21KW, the maximum torque is 27.8 Nm, and the power adjustment is low, so its front power performance will be ideal, which means that the low torque of this car will be more practical.
The actual displacement of CM300 engine is 286ml, the compression ratio is 10.7:1, the maximum power is 20.4KW, the maximum torque is 25.1N.m, and the power adjustment is moderate to high speed.
From the power data of these two engines, TR300 has obvious advantages. Combined with the composition of the two engines, TR300 will have better performance from the actual power output to the running quality of the whole machine.
However, the CM300 will have a sense of shock. After all, a single-cylinder engine will have this performance at high speed. Even if its vibration suppression is excellent, there will still be differences. However, its fuel consumption will be lower, and the fuel consumption will remain below 3 liters for basic 100 kilometers. The conservative estimate of TR300 should be around 3.5L.
Therefore, riders who pay attention to performance will easily make choices here. After all, the differences between them are very obvious.
In terms of body, the Hauser TR300 will be slightly larger than the CM300, because its wheelbase has reached 1520mm, while the CM300 has remained at 1490 mm. This difference will directly affect the comfort and handling of the two cars, and also find an excuse for the TR300' s emphasis.
In addition, these two cars will have different fuel tank volume, seat height and minimum ground clearance. The seat height of TR300 is 730mm, the fuel tank volume is kept at 16L, and the minimum ground clearance is 180mm, while CM300 has no advantages except lower seat height, which will limit the endurance and passing performance of this car.
In terms of configuration, there is not much difference between the two cars. Some mainstream configurations can be seen on them, such as sliding clutch, dual-channel ABS, LED light source, etc., but the configuration specifications used are different. Haojue did not make do with casual assembly because it is a self-owned brand, but as always, chose some related parts of internationally renowned brands, such as KYB shock absorber, Denso Japan, Mitsubishi, Nisshin, NGK, Bosch, etc.
The above are some comparative analysis of the two models, from which we can see that these two models have their own advantages, so it is hard to say who will be much better than who. Therefore, objectively speaking, the choice between these two models is still a standard for those who approve and those who like.
In other words, if you are optimistic about Honda's Haojue TR300, you will not choose it, and if you like the TR300, the CM300 will not be sought after. Therefore, this close opponent, not to mention parameter comparison, is to conduct a long-distance riding test comparison, and the final result is nothing more than this.
Using a rider's words as the conclusion of this article may enlighten you a little. "Although I didn't scold Haojue less, I paid for the TR300 today, because I didn't escape the law of true fragrance in the end."